The real technological edge enjoyed by the West in this
period was naval. There was no real equivalent in the non-Western world to
Europe's naval superiority, which bestowed at least three advantages on the
invaders. The first was power projection. If Europe discovered the world from
the fifteenth century, and not vice versa, it was because the capability in the
form of well-built ships had married the motivation to sail forth and conquer.
Navies gave the West strategic reach, a means of passage to the most distant
corners of the earth opposed only by the caprice of nature and the ships of
rival European navies. As A.T. Mahan noted in The Influence of Sea Power Upon
History, 'if Britain could be declared the winner in the imperial race, the
credit, or blame, resided with the superiority of the Royal Navy'. A second
benefit of naval superiority for imperialists was security: In the early days
when Europeans were on the defensive on land, especially in Africa and the
East, they seized coastal enclaves, often islands like Goa, St Louis de
Senegal, Hong Kong or Singapore, which they could defend and supply by sea.
Precarious frontier posts like Montreal might have succumbed to Amerindian
constriction had their communications depended exclusively on overland routes.
Finally, sea power meant operational and even tactical
mobility, which could translate into strategic advantage. Sea power was the
force multiplier for the British. The British ability to shift their troops up
and down the coast in India was an important element in their victory over the
French there. In 1762, British maritime expeditions sent to punish Spain for
her alliance with France in the Seven Years War seized both Manila and Havana.
In North America, the Royal Navy gave Britain the decisive edge over France, a
country with three times the population and ten times the army: Maritime
expeditions swept up French settlements around the Bay of Fundy in 1710,
captured Louisbourg in 1745 (and again in 1758), and imposed a blockade which,
by stemming the supply of gunpowder, munitions and muskets, began the
unravelling of France's Amerindian alliances as far inland as the Great Lakes,
the Ohio Valley and Louisiana. A seaborne strike in 1759, behind a screen of
men-of-war blockading French ports, allowed Britain to pierce the heart of New
France at Quebec, rescuing what, until then, had been a fumbling campaign of
attrition against the southern glacis of French Canada. And although the French
Navy - La Royale returned the favour twenty-two years later at Yorktown, sea
power had made land operations against New France a leisurely march to a
foregone conclusion. British maritime expeditions had harvested so many islands
of the French Antilles by 1762 that British diplomats attempting to negotiate a
peace were embarrassed by their nation's military success. British sea power
forced Napoleon to abandon the reconquest of Saint Domingue (Haiti) in 1803.
Dominance of the Pacific was essential for the victory of
the rebellious South American colonies, who promoted Lord Cochrane, a disgraced
Scottish aristocrat, to the rank of admiral, and launched a successful
amphibious assault on Lima, an oasis in the desert, from Valparaiso in Chile in
1820. Foreign corsairs organized a small fleet to assault Spanish ships in the
Caribbean.
Brown-water operations were also a feature of imperial
warfare. Lake Champlain and the Richelieu river provided a classic invasion
route into and out of New France. During the Second Seminole War, the United
States Navy operated steamboats on the larger rivers while oared, flat-bottomed
Mackinaw boats, capable of carrying twenty, moved men along the tributaries.
This permitted American troops and volunteers to re-establish their presence in
central Florida, abandoned to the Seminole chief Osceola in 1835. Without the
support of the Russian navy, the string of posts along the Black Sea created to
sever supplies from Turkey to Shamil would undoubtedly have fallen to Murid
attacks. Following the Crimean War, these maritime outposts served as bases of operations
against the Cherkess population of the western Caucasus. British victory in the
Opium War with China (1839-42) demonstrated how relatively small naval forces
could impose their will even on a vast continental empire. Sea power allowed
the British to transform what the imperial court in Beijing viewed as a distant
dispute in Canton into a struggle which directly threatened the economic health
and political stability of the empire itself. Junks and poorly defended Chinese
coastal fortifications offered scant defence against twenty-five Royal Navy
ships of the line, fourteen steamers, and nine support vessels carrying 10,000
troops. With this relatively small force, the British seized four important
coastal trading centres, sailed up the Yangtze River to block the Grand Canal
which carried much of the Celestial Empire's north-south commercial traffic,
and threatened Nanking. This was enough to bring the Chinese to the peace
table. However, in 1884-5 the French were far less successful in employing
their navy to wring concessions from the Chinese when they attacked Formosa
which, clearly, Beijing did not believe vital to its interests. The creation of
a gunboat force was critical in allowing the Celestial Empire to defeat the
Taiping and Nien rebellions, sparked by European encroachment, in the 1860s.
Naval artillery made the walled cities held by the Taipings along the Yangtze
untenable. Gun sampans and eventually gunboats on the Yellow river and Grand
Canal escorted grain convoys, and linked a defensive chain of fortifications
created to keep Nien forces from breaking out across the Yellow river, much as
the British in the Boer War of 1899-1902 used railways to link barriers of
blockhouses built to contain Boer commandos. The French pioneered river flotillas
to advance up the Senegal River toward the Niger from the 1850s.
No comments:
Post a Comment